Final answer:
The provided information suggests the main idea is related to the tax bill's economic impact, with a focus on its redistributive effects and a decrease in government deficits. The closest statement to the main idea, given the CBO's report, is that the tax bill will be good for the Alabama economy (option C).
Step-by-step explanation:
The main idea of the source seems to be related to the economical effect of a tax bill, particularly in the context of Alabama. Looking at the provided information, the statement that best represents the main idea is: 'The Tax Act will reduce spending for lower-income households while cutting taxes for higher-income households'. This information suggests that the tax bill has a redistributive effect, leaning towards a benefit for higher-income households at the expense of lower-income ones. Furthermore, mentioning that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported a decrease in deficits implies an overall potential positive impact on the economy, at least in terms of reducing government deficits.
Given the provided information, none of the original statements (A, B, C, D) directly align with the details given. Therefore, without additional context or the source text itself, it's challenging to definitively select one of those options. However, based on the CBO's report and the information provided regarding the townspeople's potential willingness to spend to ensure the tax's passage, the closest match would be option C, 'The tax bill will be good for Alabama economy' because of the mention of a decrease in deficits, which is typically considered a positive indicator for an economy.