70.8k views
5 votes
A historian uses information from primary sources to draw conclusions.
a. True
b. False

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The statement is true; primary sources are essential in allowing historians to draw conclusions about the past. These firsthand accounts are integral to piecing together historical narratives and providing valuable insights into historical events.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that a historian uses information from primary sources to draw conclusions is true. Primary sources, such as diaries, letters, government documents, and photographs, are firsthand evidence that provide a direct connection to the past. Historians analyze the context, authorship, audience, and purpose of these sources to build a foundation of knowledge and develop their interpretations of historical events. This process is essential for understanding causation and contributing factors in history, and it allows historians to construct accurate historical narratives, which are vital for understanding the human story.


The reliability and proximity in time make primary sources invaluable in the historical inquiry process. Secondary sources are also useful for providing context and starting points but may contain biases that historians need to be aware of. It is through the meticulous analysis of primary sources that historians piece together the past and develop a broader understanding of our world.

User Marek Urbanowicz
by
7.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.