Final answer:
The claim that little is known about the first settlers of Rome being Stone Age Latin-speakers is false. Historical and archaeological evidence show that early inhabitants of Rome were from various Indo-European Italic tribes, with the Latins and Sabines playing a significant role in Rome's initial settlement and the Etruscans contributing to its later development.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, “Historically little is known about the first settlers of Rome. People (Stone Age) Latin-speaking people,” is false. What is known about the earliest inhabitants of Rome is that they were part of the Indo-European linguistic family and belonged to various Italic tribes, including the Latins and the Sabines. The Latins moved into the valleys and along the Tiber River for agricultural prospects, while an early Rome consisted of a federation of autonomous villages atop its Seven Hills, including the Palatine Hill, where significant temples and religious festivities were centered.
The city of Rome offers historical advantages that contributed to its growth and expansion, such as its strategic location on hills and near the Tiber River, which provided trade routes and natural defense mechanisms. Archaeological evidence, such as a wall found around Palatine Hill and Greek pottery from the mid-eighth century BCE, supports the assertion that the founding of Rome dates back to around 753 BCE. While mythological stories tell of extended foundations involving figures like Romulus and Aeneas, the historical accounts are backed by archaeological findings and speak of a more complex amalgam of cultures, including the influence of the Greeks, Etruscans, and later on, the assimilation of the Celts into the Roman culture.