Question

What rationale questions Grant and Carradine's view of Sir Thomas More as a reliable eye-witness to Richard III’s life?

A) Discrepancies in More's timeline
B) Lack of firsthand encounters with Richard III
C) Alleged biases in More's writings
D) Inconsistencies in More's physical descriptions of Richard III

Answer 1

Grant and Carradine question Sir Thomas More's reliability as an eyewitness to Richard III's life due to discrepancies in his timeline, lack of firsthand encounters with Richard III, alleged biases in his writings, and inconsistencies in his physical descriptions of Richard III.

Step-by-step explanation:

Grant and Carradine question Sir Thomas More's reliability as an eyewitness to Richard III's life based on several factors.

1. Discrepancies in More's timeline: More's accounts of Richard III's life contain inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the timeline of events, raising doubts about his accuracy as a witness.
2. Lack of firsthand encounters with Richard III: More did not have direct encounters with Richard III, which may undermine the reliability of his accounts and the accuracy of his observations.
3. Alleged biases in More's writings: Some scholars argue that More had personal and political biases that influenced his portrayal of Richard III, making his narratives less objective and reliable.
4. Inconsistencies in More's physical descriptions of Richard III: More's descriptions of Richard III's physical appearance vary across different accounts, casting doubt on the accuracy of his observations.

Considering these rationales, it can be argued that Grant and Carradine view More as an unreliable eyewitness to Richard III's life due to the discrepancies, lack of firsthand encounters, alleged biases, and inconsistencies in his writings and physical descriptions of Richard III.

Answer 2

Questions regarding Grant and Carradine's view of Sir Thomas More's reliability as an eye-witness to Richard III’s life often stem from discrepancies in his account, lack of direct encounters, biases in his writings, and inconsistent descriptions, all of which impact the historical narrative's credibility.

Step-by-step explanation:

Questions that challenge Grant and Carradine's view of Sir Thomas More as a reliable eye-witness to Richard III’s life focus on potential issues that would detract from More's credibility. These include A) Discrepancies in More's timeline, questioning the accuracy of events; B) Lack of firsthand encounters with Richard III, implying More did not have personal direct observations; C) Alleged biases in More's writings, suggesting More might have had preconceptions or motivations that colored his narrative; and D) Inconsistencies in More's physical descriptions of Richard III, which could indicate a disconnect from actual witness accounts. It is also important to consider how various factors, such as the availability of records to the public and the personal experiences and viewpoints of authors, can influence historical narratives and their perceived reliability.