Final answer:
The establishment of federal courts in each state and the demand for a Bill of Rights were reactions to the fear that a strong central government might infringe on states' rights and individual liberties. These additions aimed to ensure protections such as jury trials and religious freedom remained intact for citizens, and were a condition for the ratification of the Constitution by several states.
Step-by-step explanation:
Fear of a Strong Central Government Leading to the Creation of a Bill of Rights
The feature created due to a fear of a central government with a court system that might be unfair to the rights of states was the establishment of federal courts within each state and the demand for a Bill of Rights. Concerns that federal courts would be too remote from the defendants' locales prompted the federal government to establish courts closer to the people. Moreover, fears that the Constitution did not guarantee individual liberties led to calls for a Bill of Rights, which would enumerate and protect civil liberties, ensuring that rights such as jury trials, arms possession, and religious freedom would not be violated by the central government. The lack of these protections in the Constitution was highlighted by states like Virginia, which had its own extensive statement of rights. Ultimately, the inclusion of a Bill of Rights became a crucial condition for ratification of the Constitution by several states.
Delegates who favored states' rights advocated for a central government with sufficient power to defend the nation, but insisted that other powers be left to the states, as states were deemed closer to and more protective of the needs and rights of their residents. This tension between the need for a nationally unified government and the desire to retain local control at the state level led to a compromise—a federal system that balanced the powers of the national government with those of the states.