Final answer:
The statement that does not describe strict liability is that claimants must prove a product defect caused injury, because strict liability implies liability without needing to prove fault.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of strict liability applies to certain legal situations where a party is held responsible for damages or injuries caused by their actions or products, regardless of fault or intent. One statement that does not describe the concept of strict liability is that claimants may need to provide proof that a product defect caused an injury (option c). This statement contradicts the basic principle of strict liability, where a defendant can be held liable without the claimant having to prove negligence or fault. In strict liability cases, particularly in product liability, once it's established that the product is defective and the defect caused injury, the manufacturer can be held liable.
For example, in the scenario where an automobile manufacturer is aware of a defect in a car's brake system but proceeds to sell the car anyway, strict liability would apply. When brake failures occur and cause injuries or deaths, the manufacturer is held liable due to their prior knowledge of the defect.