Final Answer:
When analyzing a primary source, a historian is primarily concerned with what the source reveals about the event or time period. Thus, the corrcet option is a.
Step-by-step explanation:
Historians scrutinize primary sources to gain direct insights into historical events or periods. These sources—whether documents, artifacts, or recordings—offer firsthand accounts or evidence from the time being studied.
Understanding the context, biases, and intentions behind the primary source is crucial. Historians assess the credibility, reliability, and relevance of the information provided. They aim to extract valuable details about the event or period under examination from these primary materials.
By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history, enabling them to interpret and narrate events with greater depth and clarity. The focus remains on deciphering what the primary source itself can reveal, rather than relying solely on external opinions, modern adaptations, or the popularity of the story in subsequent times.
Therefore, the corrcet option is a.