Final answer:
The reasonable person standard varies based on the occupation of the defendant and facts and circumstances of the situation, as these can influence expected knowledge, skills, and reasonable behavior within a specific context.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reasonable person standard is a legal concept used to determine how an average person with ordinary prudence would act in certain circumstances. This standard can vary based on various factors. Specifically, the reasonable person standard may vary based on A. The occupation of the defendant as different professions have different levels of knowledge and skills expected from them. Moreover, D. Facts and circumstances of the situation are crucial as they can greatly influence what is considered reasonable behavior in a given context. The attributes of the plaintiff are not directly relevant to the reasonable person standard, which focuses on the defendant's conduct. Similarly, while the attributes of jury members may influence their personal views, the legal standard is supposed to reflect an objective measure of reasonableness rather than the subjective perspectives of individual jurors.