47.1k views
2 votes
Do you agree with the Court's ruling or with Justice Stewart's dissent in the Abington School District v. Schempp case? Give reasons for your answer.

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruled in Abington School District v. Schempp that school-sponsored reading of the Bible and recitation of the Lord's Prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. This decision upholds the principle of separation of church and state and protects religious freedom for all individuals.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of Abington School District v. Schempp, the Supreme Court ruled that school-sponsored reading of the Bible and recitation of the Lord's Prayer in public schools is unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause. I agree with the Court's ruling because it upholds the principle of separation of church and state, which is a fundamental aspect of the First Amendment. The establishment clause ensures that the government does not favor or promote any particular religion, thus protecting religious freedom for all individuals.

User Babbata
by
7.9k points