Final answer:
In an AAR, it is important to discuss what was supposed to happen before discussing what actually happened. Understanding the intended outcome provides context for evaluating the actual outcome and identifying areas of improvement.
Step-by-step explanation:
In an AAR (After Action Review), it is important to discuss what was supposed to happen before discussing what actually happened. This is because understanding what was supposed to happen helps provide context and allows for a comparison between the intended outcome and the actual outcome. By analyzing the expectations and goals set beforehand, it becomes easier to identify areas of improvement and learn from mistakes made.
Discussing what was supposed to happen first enables a clear understanding of the objectives, plans, and strategies that were put in place. This sets the stage for evaluating the effectiveness of the plan and identifying any discrepancies between what was expected and what actually occurred. It allows for a comprehensive assessment of both successes and failures, leading to a more thorough analysis.
By discussing what actually happened after evaluating the initial expectations, it becomes possible to identify reasons for any discrepancies and understand the impact of unforeseen circumstances or factors that influenced the outcome. This allows for a more accurate assessment of the situation and aids in developing strategies to improve performance in the future.