Final answer:
Owners do not always have a lot of influence over an organization as influence depends on multiple factors such as company structure and size. In proprietary colonies, proprietors had responsibilities beyond profit collection, involving colony management. Colonial governors could veto legislation passed by colonial assemblies.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the influence of owners over an organization, it is generally false to claim that owners always have a lot of influence. While owners may have significant influence, other factors such as company size, structure, and governing laws contribute to how much influence they actually wield. For example, in a publicly traded company, a large group of shareholders are the true owners, but their individual influence may be diluted compared to the board of directors and the company's executives.
Regarding the operations of a proprietary colony, the statement that Proprietors have no responsibilities except to collect profits is also false. These proprietors had to manage the colony's affairs, such as governing the populace and making decisions for its welfare, economic development, and defense.
In the case of colonial governors, they did indeed have the right to veto legislation passed by the colonial assemblies, reflecting the checks and balances in colonial governance systems.