Question

Why did Orlove pay the fishermen who participated in the research? What problems could this technique create?

A) To compensate for their time and effort; potential bias in reporting catches due to financial incentives.
B) As an incentive for accurate reporting; potential financial burden on the researcher.
C) As a gesture of goodwill; potential resentment among non-participating fishermen.
D) To fund community development projects; potential inflation of catch data.

Answer 1

Orlove paid fishermen for their participation to compensate for their time, which could potentially lead to biased reporting of catches due to financial incentives.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question centers around the rationale and potential issues behind Orlove's decision to pay fishermen who participated in research. The most accurate reason for this payment is A) To compensate for their time and effort; however, this approach could potentially lead to bias in reporting catches due to the financial incentives.

By opting for this method, Orlove likely aimed to value the fishermen's contribution to the research by offsetting any economic losses they might incur while participating. However, the introduction of such incentives could inadvertently influence the fishermen to exaggerate their catch data to secure or increase payments, which could distort the research findings and undermine the goal of sustainable fishing practices.