Final answer:
The silverside, a theoretical fish in this context, may have been introduced for sport or commercial fishing, or biodiversity reasons. It could have replaced trout due to various factors such as greater adaptability or competitive advantage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Introducing non-native species into an ecosystem can have significant impacts on the existing flora and fauna.
In the context provided, the silverside, which is not specifically mentioned but can be considered analogous to other fish species introduced into non-native environments, was likely introduced for a purpose such as sport fishing, commercial fishing, or to enhance biodiversity.
Fish such as the silverside may eventually replace native species like trout due to various factors including adaptability to new environments, lack of natural predators, or direct competition for resources.
For instance, the introduction of the Nile perch in Lake Victoria, primarily for commercial fishing purposes, led to the decline of native cichlids, showing how introduced species can outcompete and lead to the extinction of native species.
Similarly, non-native trout have been observed to replace native species in streams due to their aggressive interactions and in some cases, introduction for sport fishing purposes.
Fishermen may prefer such introduced species over native ones due to their abundance, which is often a result of the species having a competitive edge over native species or being more resilient to environmental changes caused by human activity.