Question

How did Orlove resolve the issue about using the term 'fishermen' as opposed to 'fisher' or some other term to describe the people he was studying?

A) He used 'fisher' to be more gender-neutral.
B) He opted for 'fisherman' to maintain a traditional term.
C) He used both terms interchangeably throughout his research.
D) He chose 'fisher' to be more inclusive and respectful of gender diversity.

Answer 1

Without specific information about Orlove's decision, it's impossible to determine which term he chose. Contemporary linguistic trends suggest a move towards gender-neutral terms like 'fisher' over 'fishermen' to avoid gender bias and to be more inclusive. The correct options are A B C D.

Step-by-step explanation:

The issue of gender neutrality in language is an important one in contemporary research and writing. In the context of the use of the terms 'fisherman' versus 'fisher', the resolution of the issue by Orlove is not specified in the provided materials.

Therefore, without additional information, I am unable to provide which option (A, B, C, or D) correctly reflects Orlove's decision on this matter. However, it is clear that the choice of terms can reflect a writer's commitment to gender bias avoidance.

The evolution of the English language to include more gender-neutral terms suggests that careful consideration is given to inclusivity, as indicated by the replacement of gender-specific words like 'fisherman' with more inclusive ones like 'fisher'. The correct options are A B C D.