Final answer:
FAT1 and FAT2 being exactly like MFT is false. They refer to different proteins or genes in biology, and are not comparable terms. Additionally, unsaturated fats and trans fats are not the same due to the difference in their chemical structure and health implications.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that FAT1 and FAT2 are exactly like MFT is false. In the context of biology, FAT1 and FAT2 refer to genes that encode proteins involved in cell growth and development, among other functions. They are not equivalent to MFT, which could refer to various different terms across different fields, but in biology, it might refer to mitochondrial fusion. Speaking in terms of fatty acids and nutrition, the provided reference statement (d) is misleading. Unsaturated fats and trans fats are not the same; while both are types of fatty acids, unsaturated fats have at least one double bond in the fatty acid chain with hydrogen atoms on the same side (cis configuration), whereas trans fats have the hydrogens on opposite sides of the double bond (trans configuration). This structural difference significantly impacts health outcomes, as unsaturated fats are generally considered healthier than trans fats.