172k views
5 votes
Which of the following claims must be false?

a) I saw the full moon close to the horizon.
b) I stood at a fixed location on Earth and the sun didn't rise for more than a month.
c) I saw Polaris while I was on vacation in Australia.
d) I saw the Moon in the sky during the day.
e) I saw a lunar eclipse in Toronto at the same time as my friend saw it from Brazil.

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The false claim is 'I saw Polaris while I was on vacation in Australia', as Polaris is not visible in the southern hemisphere.

Step-by-step explanation:

Looking at each claim closely, we can determine which one must be false:

  • Full moon close to the horizon: This is a common sight and is entirely possible, as the full moon is often seen near the horizon when it rises or sets.
  • Sun not rising for more than a month: This occurs in regions within the Arctic or Antarctic Circles during their respective polar nights, which is a natural phenomenon.
  • Saw Polaris in Australia: This claim must be false. The North Star, Polaris, is not visible in the southern hemisphere; it can be used for navigation only in the northern hemisphere.
  • Moon in the sky during the day: The Moon can often be seen in the sky during the day, which is a normal occurrence.
  • Lunar eclipse visible simultaneously in Toronto and Brazil: This is possible as lunar eclipses can be seen from anywhere on Earth where it is nighttime.

Therefore, the false claim is: I saw Polaris while I was on vacation in Australia.

User Michael Krikorev
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories