Final answer:
The change in ownership interests is considered substantive if it aligns with the established principles of justice in acquisition and transfer, which require entitlement through just means.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Is the change in ownership interests in the item transferred substantive?' pertains to principles of justice concerning entitlement and ownership transfers. When we refer to the substantive nature of the change in ownership, we are looking at whether the transaction has resulted in a meaningful alteration in the rights or interests concerning the item in question. This implies assessing the validity and ethical standing of the transfer in line with certain guiding principles.
Principles of Justice in Acquisition and Transfer
Based on the provided information, we understand that:
A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the Principle of Justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding.
A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the Principle of Justice in transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to the holding.
No one is entitled to a holding except by repeated applications of (1) and (2).
Therefore, if a change in ownership interests adheres to these principles, it is considered substantive. If these principles are bypassed or violated, the change might not be regarded as substantive. The question of substantiveness is linked to the legitimacy and justice of the transfer process.