Final answer:
The query about the ratio in 'Hirachand v Temple' seems to combine two unrelated concepts: the historical Temple of Amrit and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index from Business. There's historical context about temple excavation, and an illustration of market concentration ratios.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio in Hirachand v Temple likely refers to legal precedence or decisions within a law context, which would involve a case name being presented in the format of 'Party v Party'. However, there appears to be confusion in the question between two distinct topics. The first part of the reference seems mixed up with the historical site of the Temple of Amrit which includes the excavation of a large court and the distinctive burial towers called spindles. On the other hand, the 'ratio' mentioned could be confused with the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (Hirachand possibly misinterpreted as Herfindahl-Hirschman), which is a measure used in Business and Economics to indicate the level of competition in an industry and to measure market concentration. The example given outlines a scenario where two industries have the same four-firm concentration ratio of 80, but very different distributions of market share among the leading firms, thereby affecting the competition in the market.