Final answer:
Jamal's belief in criminals receiving the punishment they deserve aligns with retributive justice, which focuses on the principle that punishments should fit the crime committed rather than serving future-oriented goals such as deterrence or rehabilitation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jamal's argument that criminals like serial killers who were executed got what they deserved is best aligned with the retributive justice model. This model seeks to punish individuals for their past crimes, and it is based on the notion of 'just desserts,' where the punishment fits the crime and is justified by the wrongdoing itself, rather than by what future benefits such punishment might bring.
In contrast, deterrence theory is about preventing future crimes, the rehabilitation model focuses on transforming the offender into a productive member of society, and restorative justice aims to repair the harm caused by the crime to the victims and community.