Final answer:
The passage reflects on how military authority can change an individual's behavior, even during peacetime, enabling actions that wouldn't be accepted in civilian life. Military life requires a balance of humanity and strict discipline to maintain effectiveness and control. The misuse of authority can affect both military operations and the well-being of individuals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The passage in question seems to reflect on how authority and the military structure can drastically change a person's behavior, particularly during peacetime. In civilian life, certain behaviors may not be tolerated, but within the army, the hierarchical structure and the exercise of power can lead to different standards of conduct. The influence of this authority is highlighted by the fact that those who may have been insignificant in their civilian lives may have their behavior affected to a greater degree in the military, potentially leading to misconduct without the usual social repercussions. This notion aligns with historical observations that suggest military life can shape individuals in unique and sometimes troubling ways. The strict discipline in the army, as noted in historical texts, can bring about a sense of control and organization, but it can also allow for behavior that is otherwise unacceptable in civilian life. It's important to balance humanity with iron discipline to ensure that soldiers are effective without becoming 'spoilt children,' as one source mentions.
Furthermore, the ability of officials to misuse their authority in exploiting labor or adapting poorly to circumstances demonstrates the multifaceted consequences of power within the military. Understanding the dynamics of military life in peacetime is essential not only for military efficiency but also for the well-being of the individuals within.