Final answer:
Continuance Commitment is when an employee stays with an organization because leaving would entail significant costs, often tied to financial benefits or invested time. It's distinct from normative or affective commitment, which entail voluntary loyalty or emotional attachment, respectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
A person who stays with a company because they have too much invested in the company to quit is experiencing what is known as Continuance Commitment. This type of organizational commitment occurs when an employee remains with an organization due to perceived costs of leaving, such as loss of financial benefits, seniority, or the investment of time. The employee may not necessarily enjoy the job or feel a sense of loyalty to the company (affective commitment), but they feel compelled to stay because of the investments they've made or the lack of comparable options elsewhere.
Utilitarian organizations, such as high schools and workplaces, are places people join because of tangible rewards or benefits, like earning a diploma or a salary. On the other hand, normative commitment is related to voluntary or normative organizations where individuals join based on shared interests or values, and is characterized by a sense of obligation or duty to remain. This isn't the case for someone who stays due to financial or similar investments; instead, the binding force is utilitarian and grounded in the pragmatic costs and benefits associated with the employment.