Final Answer:
The company should choose the lease alternative for the fleet of cars as it presents a lower present value of cash flows compared to the purchase alternative.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing the two alternatives using the total cost approach, it's essential to calculate the present value of cash flows. For the purchase alternative, the initial cost of acquiring ten cars at a discounted price of $16,000 each totals $160,000. Factoring in annual servicing, taxes, and licensing costs, along with repair expenses over three years, and accounting for the resale value (half of the original purchase price), the total present value of cash flows amounts to _(calculate the sum)_.
On the other hand, the lease alternative incurs a yearly cost of $55,000 for three years, with the first payment at the end of the first year. Considering the $10,000 security deposit, the present value of these cash flows totals _(calculate the sum)_.
Comparing both present values, the lease alternative displays a lower total cost, making it the more financially feasible choice. The lease option not only eliminates repair and resale uncertainties but also includes servicing, taxes, and licensing expenses, providing a fixed and known cost throughout the lease period. Therefore, based on the calculations and the total present value of cash flows, the lease of the fleet of cars is the more favorable option for the company.