Main Answer:
Susan Bruce argues that Edmund's malevolent actions in the play are justified within the context.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Bruce's perspective, Edmund's character is not a mere embodiment of villainy; rather, she contends that his actions are rooted in a complex interplay of societal injustices and personal struggles. Edmund, as portrayed by Bruce, becomes a product of the harsh societal norms that marginalize illegitimate children, pushing him to rebel against the oppressive structures that confine him. Bruce suggests that his actions are a response to a system that denies him legitimate rights and privileges, making his malevolence a calculated and, in his view, necessary rebellion.
Furthermore, Bruce delves into the psychological dimensions of Edmund's character, emphasizing the internal conflicts that drive his actions. She posits that his malevolence is not gratuitous but stems from a deep-seated desire for recognition and legitimacy. By examining the play through this lens, Bruce prompts the audience to empathize with Edmund's plight, challenging traditional notions of morality.
In conclusion, Susan Bruce's perspective on Edmund's character nuances the portrayal of his malevolence, positioning it as a response to societal injustices and a quest for personal validation. This interpretation adds layers to the character, inviting the audience to question the moral framework within the play.