Final answer:
The court may potentially pierce the corporate veil in the Big Bend Hotel case, depending on the specific facts and circumstances involved.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case of the Big Bend Hotel, the court may potentially pierce the corporate veil if it is found that the hotel is being used to commit fraud or to avoid legal obligations. Piercing the corporate veil means that the court will disregard the separation between the hotel and its owners, holding the owners personally liable for the hotel's actions or debts. However, whether or not the court would actually pierce the corporate veil depends on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.