Final Answer:
An inductive argument that fails to demonstrate that the truth of its conclusion is probable or likely is referred to as a weak inductive argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
Inductive arguments are characterized by the fact that their conclusions are not necessarily guaranteed by their premises. Instead, they provide support or evidence that makes the conclusion probable. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the degree of support it provides for the conclusion. A weak inductive argument is one that lacks sufficient support to make the conclusion probable or likely.
In evaluating the strength of an inductive argument, it's essential to consider the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence provided. If the evidence is weak or irrelevant to the conclusion, the argument is likely to be weak. Additionally, the number of instances or examples cited in support of the conclusion can impact the strength of the argument. A small or biased sample may not adequately represent the broader population, leading to a weak inductive argument.
In summary, a weak inductive argument is characterized by insufficient or irrelevant evidence, making it fail to demonstrate that the truth of its conclusion is probable or likely. It is crucial to critically assess the quality of evidence and the reasoning used in inductive arguments to determine their strength or weakness.