Final answer:
Firm B has a stronger incentive to cheat in a duopoly collusion setting, while Firm A is less likely to cheat due to asymmetric incentives and risks, leading to the possibility of both firms maintaining collusion.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering a duopoly scenario with Firm A and Firm B, where each firm has the option to produce at a collusion level QC or at a non-collusion level QNC, we examine the incentives to cheat on a collusion agreement. Given the dynamics of the duopoly, Firm B has a clear incentive to cheat by producing at QNC, assuming Firm A maintains production at QC. This is because Firm B can potentially double its profits through cheating while Firm A will only realize a marginal increase in profits if it decided to cheat, considering the smaller size of Firm B. Moreover, the risk associated with cheating is greater for Firm B since a 90% loss of gains can occur if Firm A decides to cheat in response. Consequently, this creates a significant deterrent for Firm B to honor the collusion. In contrast, due to the relative sizes of the firms and the limited gain for Firm A, it is less likely that Firm A will cheat. Overall, there is a possibility that both firms can adhere to the collusion due to the asymmetric incentives and risks involved.