Final answer:
In this study, 89 persons without CVD tested positive for the new Q-wave pattern, while 321 persons without CVD tested negative. The sensitivity of the new Q-wave pattern was 90%, meaning it correctly identified 90% of persons with CVD. The specificity of the new Q-wave pattern was 78%, meaning it correctly identified 78% of persons without CVD. The positive predictive value of the new Q-wave pattern was 47.6%, and the negative predictive value was 97.3%.
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) The number of persons without CVD who tested positive can be calculated by subtracting the number of persons with CVD who tested positive from the total number of persons who tested positive for the new Q-wave pattern. In this case, it would be 170 - 81 = 89 persons without CVD tested positive.
(b) The number of persons without CVD who tested negative can be calculated by subtracting the number of persons with CVD who tested negative from the total number of persons who tested negative for the new Q-wave pattern. In this case, it would be 330 - (90 - 81) = 321 persons without CVD tested negative.
(c) The sensitivity of the new Q-wave pattern can be calculated by dividing the number of persons with CVD who tested positive by the total number of persons with CVD. In this case, it would be 81/90 = 0.9 or 90%.
(d) The specificity of the new Q-wave pattern can be calculated by dividing the number of persons without CVD who tested negative by the total number of persons without CVD. In this case, it would be 321/410 = 0.78 or 78%.
(e) The positive predictive value of the new Q-wave pattern can be calculated by dividing the number of persons with CVD who tested positive by the total number of persons who tested positive for the new Q-wave pattern. In this case, it would be 81/170 = 0.476 or 47.6%.
(f) The negative predictive value of the new Q-wave pattern can be calculated by dividing the number of persons without CVD who tested negative by the total number of persons who tested negative for the new Q-wave pattern. In this case, it would be 321/330 = 0.973 or 97.3%.