Final answer:
The project manager selected a hybrid approach to balance the need for adaptability with clear product definitions and the structured planning required by a regulatory delivery deadline. This method allows for continuous improvement while ensuring that critical deadlines are met. The hybrid approach aligns with customer and stakeholder needs and supports team sustainability and conflict management.
Step-by-step explanation:
The project manager chose a hybrid approach due to several crucial factors influencing the project's execution. First, with product definitions and requirements not being fully clear, the flexibility of an agile methodology allows for changes and continuous improvement as the project evolves. However, since there is a regulatory delivery deadline, the project requires the structured planning and control that traditional project management offers.
In the context of engineering and product design, task deadlines are extremely critical, and missing them can lead to severe consequences such as loss of revenue or cancellation of the project. Given the complexity of multitasking and working with diverse teams, a hybrid approach enables the project manager to balance the structured requirements and the need for adaptability.
Furthermore, a hybrid model is beneficial in scenarios where multiple stakeholders are involved. It helps in maintaining alignment with customer needs and aligning the team's ideas to promote sustainability and manage conflicts effectively. Crucially, hybrid systems may not always be the right answer, but in this case, they provide the needed flexibility while still adhering to a structured design process, which is important for successfully meeting both customers' and stakeholders' needs.