50.4k views
5 votes
Which mathematical equation justifies the statement: ln(17) ≈ 2.833?

a) e².833 = 17
b) e¹7 = 2.833
c) e².833 ≈ 17
d) e¹7 ≈ 2.833

User MxWild
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The correct mathematical equation that justifies the statement ln(17) ≈ 2.833 is e^2.833 ≈ 17, reflecting the inverse relationship between the natural logarithm and the exponential function with base e. The correct answer option is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation that justifies the statement ln(17) ≈ 2.833 is e2.833 ≈ 17. This is because the function expressing the natural logarithm is the inverse of the exponential function with the base e, which is approximately 2.7182818. The natural logarithm of a number is the power to which e must be raised to obtain that number. For example, ln(10) is 2.303 because raising e to the power of 2.303 approximately equals 10; likewise, ln(17) is around 2.833 because e2.833 gives us a value close to 17.

To further elucidate, the relationship between an exponential function and a natural logarithm is such that ln(ex) = x and eln(x) = x. This property helps to understand why the given options in the question suggest different forms of the same relationship. However, only one option correctly represents the inverse relationship where the natural logarithm given for a value is used as the exponent for e to approximate the original number.

Comparing the options given, the correct equation e2.833 ≈ 17 aligns with the rule that eln(x) = x, and reflects the indicated approximation for ln(17). This is derived from the natural logarithmic relationship to the base e, and is applied across various mathematical and scientific contexts including growth and decay models, where the constant e and its logarithm play significant roles.

User Wilfred
by
7.7k points

Related questions

asked Nov 3, 2024 154k views
Pete Hamilton asked Nov 3, 2024
by Pete Hamilton
7.8k points
1 answer
4 votes
154k views
1 answer
2 votes
193k views