Question

a human rights commission found that maria's conduct toward a co-worker constituted harassment. what, if any, implications might this decision have for maria's employer? question 13 options: a) the employer is vicariously liable for maria's conduct. b) her employer will escape liability if it can prove it had no knowledge of maria's conduct. c) the employer must terminate maria's employment. d) there will be no negative implications for maria's employer.

Answer 1

When a human rights commission determines that Maria's conduct towards a co-worker constitutes harassment, the employer can be held vicariously liable for Maria's conduct.

Step-by-step explanation:

When a human rights commission determines that Maria's conduct towards a co-worker constitutes harassment, it can have implications for Maria's employer. The correct implication in this case is that the employer is vicariously liable for Maria's conduct. This means that the employer can be held responsible for Maria's actions, even if they were not directly involved or aware of the harassment.