Final answer:
Depending on the approach to the material, an author might be described as objective, subjective, analytical, or biased. Each of these stances has unique characteristics, such as neutral vs. emotional language, and the inclusion or exclusion of personal opinions. Examples of objective language are neutral, fact-based writing, while subjective language includes personal pronouns and expressions of personal belief.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author of a passage can be objective, subjective, analytical, or biased, depending on their approach to the material. An objective stance involves presenting evidence such as facts, statistics, and examples in a neutral and unemotional language. It suggests a distance from personal feelings to build credibility with readers. A subjective approach indicates the presence of personal opinions, beliefs, and experiences, often coloring the analysis with the author's personal views. This stands in contrast to an analytical stance, where the writer examines the subject in depth, looking at various aspects and using comparative analysis to present a thorough exploration. Lastly, a biased approach might involve language and evidence selection that subtly or overtly persuade the reader towards the author's viewpoint, often neglecting a balanced presentation of the topic.
When assessing a writer's stance, observing language use, evidence presentation, and whether personal opinions are evident can provide clues to their objectivity or bias. For example, Trevor's writing could be deemed objective if he uses neutral language and backs his claims with verifiable data. If his language is laden with personal pronouns or emotive words, it might suggest a subjective stance. Where Trevor's language influences the reader towards a particular conclusion, or where he exclusively highlights evidence that supports his own perspective, it could denote bias.