Final answer:
Yes, mandatory sentencing laws appear to reduce the use of plea bargaining and increase the number of cases that are brought to trial.
The answer is option ⇒1) Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Mandatory sentencing laws typically require judges to impose a specific minimum sentence for certain offenses. These laws limit the discretion of judges and often result in harsher punishments. When faced with the prospect of a mandatory minimum sentence, defendants may be less inclined to negotiate plea bargains with prosecutors. Instead, they may choose to go to trial in hopes of receiving a more lenient sentence or acquittal.
By reducing the use of plea bargaining, mandatory sentencing laws can lead to an increase in the number of cases that proceed to trial. Defendants who believe they have a chance of receiving a more favorable outcome in court may be more willing to take their case to trial rather than accept a plea deal.
It is important to note that the impact of mandatory sentencing laws on plea bargaining and trial rates can vary depending on various factors such as the specific laws in place, jurisdiction, and individual circumstances. However, as a general trend, mandatory sentencing laws are believed to contribute to a decrease in plea bargaining and an increase in the number of cases that go to trial.
The answer is option ⇒1) Yes