Final answer:
A threat of future bodily harm would not be sufficient for robbery, as it does not involve immediate harm. Robbery generally requires the use or threat of immediate bodily harm.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for an act to be considered robbery, it generally requires the use or threat of immediate bodily harm. Therefore, a threat of future bodily harm would not be sufficient for robbery, as it does not meet the requirement of immediate harm. Robbery typically involves the taking of someone's property through force, fear, or intimidation, with the intention to permanently deprive the person of their property.
For example, if a person threatens to harm someone in the future unless they give them money, this would not be considered robbery. However, it may still be considered a crime, such as extortion or making threats, depending on the jurisdiction.