Question

All of the following statements describe the concept of strict liability except?

1) it is imposed on defendants engaged in hazardous activities
2) claimants may need to provide proof that a product defect caused an injury
3) it is imposed regardless of fault
4) it is applied in product liability cases

Answer 1

The statement not describing strict liability is that claimants may need to provide proof of a product defect causing injury. Strict liability is often applied in hazardous activities and defective products cases without a claimant proving fault.

Step-by-step explanation:

The concept of strict liability refers to a legal doctrine where a party is held liable for damages or injury caused by their actions or products, regardless of fault or intent. In the context of the question, the statement that does not describe the concept of strict liability is option 2: "claimants may need to provide proof that a product defect caused an injury". The principle of strict liability often eliminates the need for a claimant to prove negligence or fault. It is most commonly applied in cases involving hazardous activities or defective products. For example, if a manufacturer knowingly sells a car model with defective brakes, as in our counter example situation, they can be held strictly liable for any resulting injuries or fatalities.

Counter Example Situation

The fact that the manufacturer proceeded with the production and sale of a car model with known brake defects and the occurrence of injuries and fatalities as a result allows the imposition of strict liability. The manufacturer's prior