18.5k views
0 votes
In Brown v. Brown, 877 So.2d 1228 (La. Ct. App. 2004), What did the Court of Appeal of Louisiana for the Second Circuit hold regarding a wife's secretly-recorded telephone conversations with her husband on her own telephone?

User Sliter
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

In Brown v. Brown, the Court of Appeal of Louisiana for the Second Circuit held that a wife's secretly-recorded telephone conversations with her husband on her own telephone were admissible as evidence in court.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Brown v. Brown, 877 So.2d 1228 (La. Ct. App. 2004), the Court of Appeal of Louisiana for the Second Circuit held that a wife's secretly-recorded telephone conversations with her husband on her own telephone were admissible as evidence in court. The court ruled that because the wife was a party to the conversations and had consented to the recordings, there was no violation of any privacy rights. The court emphasized that the expectation of privacy is diminished when communicating with a spouse.

User Pmichna
by
8.2k points