Question

In State v. Madison, the Louisiana Supreme Court announced that when an indigent defendant's legally appointed defense attorney cannot secure information on which to construct a defense, the indigent defendant may have a right to a private investigator. What was the ruling in the case of State v. Madison regarding the right to a private investigator for indigent defendants?

1) The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants have a right to a private investigator in all cases.
2) The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants do not have a right to a private investigator.
3) The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants may have a right to a private investigator under certain circumstances.
4) The Louisiana Supreme Court did not address the issue of a right to a private investigator for indigent defendants.

Answer 1

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants may have a right to a private investigator under certain circumstances in the case of State v. Madison.

Step-by-step explanation:

In State v. Madison, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that under certain circumstances, an indigent defendant may have a right to a private investigator to aid in their defense. This means that the court acknowledged the situation where a legally appointed defense attorney struggles to gather necessary information for a defense due to the lack of resources, which in turn could hinder the right to a fair trial. Thus, the correct option regarding the ruling in State v. Madison about the right to a private investigator for indigent defendants is: 3) The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that indigent defendants may have a right to a private investigator under certain circumstances.