Final answer:
Deadly force is typically not justified against a suspect fleeing from a misdemeanor unless they pose an immediate threat. High-profile cases like Eric Garner and Breonna Taylor, where deadly force was used in questionable circumstances, underscore issues of racial disparity and the need for law enforcement reform and accountability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The use of deadly force against suspects fleeing from a misdemeanor charge is a very controversial subject in the realm of law enforcement and criminal justice. In general, the use of deadly force is not justified in situations where a suspect is merely suspected of a misdemeanor and poses no immediate threat to the officer or others. However, there have been incidents that challenge this norm, raising significant concerns regarding police practices, racial disparities and the accountability of law enforcement. For instance the cases of Eric Garner and Breonna Taylor highlight instances where deadly force was used under questionable circumstances with no direct convictions resulting from these actions.
These situations illustrate a broad scale issue of racial tension and the perception of unequal justice within the community which is further amplified by the disproportionate number of unarmed Black individuals affected in such incidents. To address these issues there's a need for policy reform and practice changes to ensure that law enforcement acts appropriately and without bias. Measures such as de-escalation training, body cameras, and community engagement are often suggested as potential solutions. The responsibility is collective involving policy makers, law enforcement agencies and communities, to initiate meaningful change and reduce racial tension.