Question

In Mapp v. OHIO, What did the court consider regarding the right of a defendant to have counsel at trial?

Answer 1

In Mapp v. Ohio, the court considered the right of a defendant to have counsel at trial. The court held that the right to counsel is essential for a fair trial, and therefore, the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in criminal cases extends to felony defendants in state courts.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Mapp v. Ohio, the court considered the right of a defendant to have counsel at trial. The court held that the right to counsel is essential for a fair trial, and therefore, the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in criminal cases extends to felony defendants in state courts. This means that if a defendant cannot afford an attorney, the state must appoint one for them.