180k views
3 votes
Can you provide a review of integrated math textbooks for high school?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The integrated math textbooks for high school have undergone extensive review and development by Texas faculty, ensuring clarity, accuracy, and alignment with educational standards. Flexible design options cater to varied teaching approaches and foster effective learning through critical thinking exercises and an enhanced art program.

Step-by-step explanation:

The review of integrated math textbooks for high school reveals a comprehensive development and assessment process led by qualified and experienced Texas faculty. To ensure the textbooks' effectiveness, they were subject to rigorous reviews for clarity, accuracy, alignment with TEKS, and overall quality. Particularly, the textbooks are designed to tackle the evident issue that the high school curriculum is not properly addressing basic math skills such as fractions, percentages, and long division, as highlighted by the results of the High School Exit Exam.

In their development, textbook creators took into account common course issues, effective teaching strategies, and student engagement. This holistic approach aims to support instructors and promote effective student learning experiences. Activities like Review Questions, Thought Questions, Figuring For Yourself, and Collaborative Group Activities are incorporated to foster critical thinking and collaborative work. Adding to the learning experience is a high-quality art program that aims to aid comprehension through visuals.

Overall, the textbooks reviewed offer a level of flexibility that caters to various teaching methods and course depths, with math examples presented in separate sections for optional inclusion. This level of adaptability is significant in addressing the varying needs of different classrooms and students. Also, the textbooks' alignment to introductory physics and astronomy courses incorporates algebra-based calculations, demonstrating their scope and sequence for broader scientific understanding.

User Stephen Veiss
by
7.8k points