Final answer:
An architect cannot terminate an agreement for failing to meet project deadlines if the delay is the result of the architect's own poor design decisions. In contrast, client failures such as non-payment, not obtaining permits, or not complying with building codes can justify termination by an architect.
Step-by-step explanation:
An architect may have several reasons to terminate an agreement with a client, but there are specific situations that do not directly lead to such action. In the context of architectural contracts, the inability to terminate an agreement does not typically extend to the architect's own failings, such as poor design decisions.
An architect cannot terminate the agreement if they fail to meet project deadlines due to their own poor design decisions. This is because it is their professional obligation to manage the design process appropriately and ensure that timelines are met. If the failure to meet deadlines is due to their own inadequacy, it is not a fault of the client, and thus, not a justifiable reason for terminating the contract.
It is imperative to recognize that an architect may terminate a contract for reasons such as failure to make payments by the client, failure by the client to obtain necessary permits, or failure by the client to comply with building codes. Nevertheless, the architect's own shortcomings, such as missing project deadlines due to their design errors, do not grant them the right to end the agreement. It is in the spirit of contractual rights and property rights that services rendered are met with due compensation and responsibility.