Final answer:
Under the principle of strict liability, a person who keeps wild animals on their premises can be held liable for any injuries caused by these animals, regardless of whether or not the owner was negligent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Under the principle of strict liability, a person who keeps wild animals on their premises can be held liable for any injuries caused by these animals, regardless of whether or not the owner was negligent. This means that the owner is responsible for the harm caused by their animals, even if they took precautions to prevent it.
For example, if a person keeps a tiger on their property and the tiger escapes and injures someone, the owner can be held strictly liable for the person's injuries. The injured person does not need to prove that the owner was negligent or that they did anything wrong. They only need to show that the owner kept a wild animal on their premises and that the animal caused their injuries.
It is important for individuals who keep wild animals to understand the potential liability they may face and take necessary precautions to prevent harm to others.