Final answer:
Florida 90.407 is a statute in evidence law that prohibits the admission of subsequent remedial measures as evidence to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a product defect, or a warning need. This legal principle encourages safety improvements by ensuring such actions can't be used against the improving party in court.
Step-by-step explanation:
Florida 90.407 pertains to evidence law and specifically addresses subsequent remedial measures. According to this statute, when measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur evidence of those measures is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in a product, a defect in a product’s design or a need for a warning or instruction.
This rule highlights the public policy to encourage individuals or companies to make safety improvements without the fear of those actions being used against them as evidence in court. The correct answer to the question is that Florida 90.407 refers to a specific law in Florida regarding subsequent remedial measures. It is a code that prohibits the use of evidence of subsequent remedial measures to prove certain types of conduct or liability in legal proceedings. Its intention is to not deter individuals or entities from making improvements or changes that would increase safety or prevent further harm.