In this case, given that the team won a significant proportion of games when scoring at least 100 points, one can argue that there is a "weak, positive association" between scoring at least 100 points and winning. This implies that while scoring at least 100 points is generally favorable for winning, other factors may also influence the outcome of the game, and the relationship is not absolute or overwhelmingly strong.
To determine whether there is evidence of an association between scoring at least 100 points during a basketball game and the team winning, we can analyze the provided data. The table organizes wins and losses based on the number of points scored, specifically categorizing games with scores greater than or equal to 100 points and those with scores less than 100 points.
Looking at the data, the team won 50 games when scoring at least 100 points and lost only 4 such games. On the other hand, when scoring less than 100 points, the team won 90 games but also lost 4. This suggests that scoring at least 100 points is associated with a higher likelihood of winning, as the team had a higher win percentage in these games compared to those where they scored less than 100 points.
However, it's important to note that while there is a positive association between scoring at least 100 points and winning, the strength of this association is not explicitly provided in the question. The terms "weak" or "strong" associations are subjective and depend on the context of the analysis.