Final answer:
Breaking a law similar to Section 9 Clause 2, which ensures habeas corpus rights, could lead to legal penalties for the responsible parties and potential lawsuits from those whose rights were violated. The exact consequences would vary depending on the legal framework and the specific circumstances of the breach.
Step-by-step explanation:
If someone breaks Article 12A, assuming it refers to a specific law or statute which is not provided in the context, the usual consequence involves legal penalties. However, given the context you've provided, we will discuss the implications of breaching a law similar to Section 9 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from being held in jail without formal charges or a court appearance. This is a core tenet of habeas corpus rights, seeking to prevent unlawful detention.
When this principle is violated, as was argued during the presidency of George W. Bush with the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, it can lead to serious debates about constitutional rights and international law. Persons detained without being charged or brought before a judge could potentially file lawsuits for violations of their constitutional rights, specifically habeas corpus. Further, officials who violate these rights might face legal challenges, potential censure, or other consequences depending on the jurisdiction's laws and the specific circumstances of the violation.
The discussion of habeas corpus and unlawful detention is particularly relevant in the context of the war on terrorism, where traditional legal boundaries have been tested. Consequences for those who violate these legal protections depend on the balance between national security concerns and the preservation of civil liberties.