161k views
2 votes
Technician A says that R-744 refrigerant is accepted by the EPA as an alternative for retrofit. Technician B says that R-134a refrigerant is accepted by the EPA as an alternative for retrofit. Who is right?

1) Technician A is right
2) Technician B is right
3) Both technicians are right
4) Neither technician is right

User Notheros
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Technician B is correct; R-134a is accepted by the EPA as an alternative refrigerant for retrofits, while R-744 is not commonly used for retrofits.

Step-by-step explanation:

Technician A says that R-744 refrigerant is accepted by the EPA as an alternative for retrofit. Technician B says that R-134a refrigerant is accepted by the EPA as an alternative for retrofit. Concerning the accuracy of these statements, Technician B is correct.

R-134a, which is known as HFC-134a, is a hydrofluorocarbon that has been widely accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a suitable alternative refrigerant for retrofitting existing systems that previously used CFCs like Freon. On the other hand, while R-744 (Carbon Dioxide CO2) is an environmentally benign refrigerant, it has not been widely adopted for retrofits due to the changes in system design required to operate with different pressures and its use is primarily in new systems.

It is recognized for its environmentally friendly properties, as it has a low global warming potential compared to some traditional refrigerants. On the other hand, Technician B is incorrect regarding R-134a. While widely used, R-134a is a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) with a relatively high global warming potential, and its use has been subject to regulatory restrictions due to environmental concerns.

User Rambert
by
8.2k points