Final answer:
The case in question did not proceed to a full trial as it was entangled in constitutional issues and was eventually dropped by the prosecution.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to whether a particular legal case proceeded to a full trial. In the context provided, it seems that the trial was halted due to constitutional entanglements and did not continue to a conclusion.
Generally, criminal cases require the presence of both a judge and a jury, where the jury is tasked with determining the defendant's guilt and the judge with sentencing. In the scenario described, the prosecution chose to drop the case instead of moving forward. Additionally, cases may be appealed to a higher court if the losing party deems it necessary. It's also important to note the distinction between the burdens of proof in civil cases versus criminal cases, with the latter requiring proof 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.