Final answer:
The practice of using deadly force against an unarmed fleeing felon was prohibited in the landmark Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner (1985). This case established constitutional limitations on the use of deadly force by law enforcement, with growing concerns regarding such practices in light of recent high-profile incidents involving the use of deadly force against unarmed individuals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The practice of using deadly force against an unarmed fleeing felon was prohibited in the case of Tennessee v. Garner (1985). This landmark Supreme Court decision heralded a significant change in law enforcement's use of deadly force in the United States. The case set forth the principle that such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. It aimed to resolve the tensions between the need for law enforcement and the protection of citizens' constitutional rights.
Recent events have brought this issue back into the public discourse. The tragic deaths of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and Atatiana Jefferson have not only highlighted racial tensions but have also led to a nationwide examination of policing practices, particularly regarding the use of deadly force against unarmed individuals. While the conviction in the case of George Floyd is a notable exception, many such incidents have not resulted in criminal charges against the officers involved, further amplifying concerns of unequal justice.