214k views
5 votes
Which is not a step and protecting an officer from an inmate con game?

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Intentionally releasing prisoners to test trust is not a step in protecting an officer from an inmate con game; proper training and skepticism are key.

Step-by-step explanation:

Protecting an officer from an inmate con game is essential for maintaining security and order within correctional facilities. One step that is not part of protecting an officer is the intentional loosing of prisoners as a means to test trust or loyalty. This action, while it appears in poetic and historical references, is not a valid or safe method for deterring inmate manipulation tactics in modern correctional environments. Instead, officers should rely on institutional training, adherence to protocols, and professional skepticism to prevent falling victim to inmate con games. It's important to foster an environment where inmates do not feel undue pressure to participate in such activities and where officers do not trust based solely on familiarity.

User Justus Lolwerikoi
by
8.0k points