Final answer:
Kim can seek to introduce evidence of misrepresentation regarding the soundproof nature of the Grand Ballroom as part of her claim for contract rescission. She must show the misrepresentation was material to her decision and that her reliance was reasonable. The nature of the misrepresentation's intent is also key to the outcome of her rescission claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kim's situation involves a potential case of misrepresentation, in which she was told by the manager that the Grand Ballroom was soundproof, a statement which turned out to be false. In legal terms, rescission of a contract is a remedy that essentially cancels the contract, returning the parties to their positions prior to the agreement.
To succeed in getting a rescission, Kim would have to prove that the false representation was a material factor in her decision to sign the lease. Evidence of the misrepresentation can certainly be brought into court to support her claim.
The admissibility of this evidence often depends on whether Kim can show that she relied on this particular statement and that her reliance was reasonable. If the misrepresentation is considered fraudulent, negligent, or innocent, it may significantly affect Kim's ability to rescind the contract.