Final answer:
The clause mentioned in the question is related to insurance policies. Specifically, it allows a non-named insured divorcee to get a replacement policy without evidence of insurability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The clause mentioned in the question is related to insurance policies. Specifically, it is referring to a provision that allows a non-named insured divorcee to take out a replacement policy without needing to provide evidence of insurability. In this case, the non-named insured divorcee is leaving a policy they were previously covered under with their former spouse. This provision grants eligibility for the individual to obtain a new policy without undergoing the usual underwriting process.